eng homeabout usmekong riversalween rivermun riverthai baan researchpublication
 

October 15, 2001

Mr. Ian Porter
Country Director
The World Bank Office Bangkok
Diethelm Towers

14th Floor Tower A

93/1 Wireless Road

Bangkok

Thailand

Dear Mr. Porter

We, the villagers affected by the Pak Mun Dam and Assembly of the Poor, write to you from Mae Mun Man Yuen village No.1, at the Pak Mun dam site. Thousands of us have been living here since March 23, 1999 to demand the dam sluice gates be opened and the Mun River restored. We also demand that the World Bank take responsibility for the destruction of the environment which has caused suffering to us and endangered the fisheries of the Mun River.

In 1990, the World Bank and EGAT destroyed our livelihoods through the construction of the Pak Mun dam. At that time, we sent a letter to the World Bank requesting the Bank to stop providing loans to support the construction of the Pak Mun dam.  The Bank ignored our request and did not listen to our voice. For us, the decision to build the Pak Mun dam was made without the participation of local people.  

During our protest against the dam, we were promised a better way of life, but the promise was never delivered. On the contrary, our fisheries were decimated and our communities destroyed. Over the past eleven years we have learnt that the mitigation programs provided by EGAT did not solve our problems. We strongly believe that the only way to sustain our communities and our livelihood is to decommission the dam and restore the river.

The World Commission on Dams (WCD) Pak Mun Case Study Final Report found that fish catch in the reservoir and upstream of the dam has declined by 60 to 80 percent, resulting in an economic loss to villagers of about $1.4 million per annum. The report recorded that 56 species of fish have completed disappeared since the dam was built and at least 51 species have been caught less significantly since the completion of the project. According to the WCD, migratory and rapid dependent species are particularly affected as their migration route is blocked at the beginning of the rainy season. The WCD also confirmed that the fish ladder "has not been performing and is not allowing upstream fish migration."

The WCD found that the Pak Mun dam has had significant impacts on communities's livelihoods. According to WCD, “in the post-dam period, fishing communities located upstream and downstream of the dam reported 50-100% decline in fish catch and the disappearance of many fish species… Villagers who were dependent on fisheries for cash income have found no viable means of livelihood since the dam was built, despite efforts to provide training opportunities. As their food security and income was destabilised villagers sought different ways to cope, including out-migration in search of jobs." (p.60, WCD Basin Study on Pak Mun).

Economically, the WCD found the project isn't performing well, and that it contributes only marginal amounts of power. The dam was supposed to generate 136 megawatts, but barely generates 40 megawatts in high-demand months. There's simply insufficient water to turn the turbines in the dry season. According to the WCD, the actual dependable capacity of Pak Mun project calculated from daily output between 1995-1998 assuming that all available power get assigned to a 4 hour peak demand period is only 20.81 MW.” Even in the rainy season, EGAT has to shut the plant down because high water levels upstream and downstream mean there isn't enough water pressure to drive the turbines.

Moreover, the WCD found that the actual irrigation benefits are zero. The WCD concludes "it is unlikely that the project would have been built if actual true benefits would have been used in the economic analysis."

In 2001, after we held a long protest at the dam site and Government House, the Thai Government agreed to open the Pak Mun dam’s gates for 4 months to allow fish migration upstream. Two months after the dam gates were opened, we conducted our own report and found that 119 fish species had returned to the Mun River. From our knowledge, we found 99 species are migratory fish including eels, which migrate from the South China Sea.

We also found 54 species of native plants and 23 species of herbal plants, which grow on the river banks after the water recedes.

We have learnt that opening the dam’s gates this year has not restored the Mun river ecosystem, but it has also brought back our livelihood. We have been able to generate income from fisheries as well as increasing our food security.

The information above confirms that the dam your institution has supported has caused destruction to the river and our communities, and that opening the dam's gates is the only way to solve our problems.

Therefore, we call on the World Bank to take responsibility for the destruction you have caused to our lives and to the ecology and fisheries of the Mun River.

The WCD in its final report recommends that the World Bank "Review the portfolio of past projects to identify those that may have underperformed or present unresolved issues and share in addressing the burden of such projects for borrower countries. This may include, for example … providing new support to help borrower countries address unresolved economic, social, and environmental problems."

The Pak Mun dam is such a project. We demand the World Bank work with the Thai government to decommission the Pak Mun dam by opening the dam’s gates permanently and restoring the Mun River. We believe that opening the Pak Mun dam’s gates permanently will not be useful only for our communities but also for our next generations including the life of the millions of people in the Mun/Chi and Mekong basins who are dependent on the fish from the Mun River.

We also demand the World Bank work with us to develop a reparations program to restore the livelihoods of our communities.

These are the ways and means to solve our problems and we sincerely hope that you are seriously concerned with our demands.

Yours sincerely,

Villagers Affected by Pak Mun Dam and Assembly of the Poor

Mae Mun Man Yuen Village No.1

Near by the Pak Mun Dam Site

Kong Jiam District 

Ubol Ratchathani

P.O.Box 20, Kong Jiam Post Office, Ubol Ratchathani

 
 

สมาคมแม่น้ำเพื่อชีวิต   138/1 หมู่ 4 ต.สุเทพ อ.เมือง จ.เชียงใหม่   50200
Living River Siam Association  138 Moo 4, Suthep, Muang, Chiang Mai, 50200   Thailand
Tel. & Fax.: (66)-       E-mail : admin@livingriversiam.org

ข้อมูลในเวปนี้สามารถนำไปเผยแพร่ได้โดยอ้างอิงแหล่งที่มา